WebRTC platform development
End-to-end engineering: signaling, media negotiation, browser compatibility and mobile support.
Services
The hardest case in web engineering: WebRTC media, SFUs, SIP interop and live captioning under real-world network conditions — engineered by the team behind Sonar, a video-consultation platform used in the German banking sector.
Evidence
Capabilities
End-to-end engineering: signaling, media negotiation, browser compatibility and mobile support.
We design and build on current media stacks: LiveKit (including SIP/telephony interop, which we have built hands-on) and mediasoup-class SFUs. Stack selection is driven by your requirements, not by habit.
Few teams still carry deep, production-grade Kurento expertise; we do. We operate legacy Kurento estates and migrate them to modern stacks (LiveKit, mediasoup) while preserving recording, compliance and in-pipeline processing features.
Advisor-to-customer video for regulated industries, including recording, waiting-room and queue management, built through our long-term work on a video-consultation platform for German banks.
Real-time multilingual subtitles in 15 languages, including Indian languages, powered by Whisper ASR integrated directly into the media pipeline. The model work behind it is described under AI & model engineering.
Computer-vision analysis of live video streams, such as our AI damage analysis for insurance video calls.
Method
Media topology, codec strategy, and scaling model are decided before code is written — retrofitting these is expensive.
New builds start from current SFU architecture; the signaling, recording and media-handling patterns come from years of operating a production video-consultation platform.
Packet loss, NAT traversal, low bandwidth and browser quirks are part of our test matrix, not surprises in production.
We offer ongoing operation and monitoring — real-time media is a living system, not a delivered artifact.
FAQ
Yes. That is our deepest track record: we are the long-term engineering partner for Sonar, a video-consultation platform whose users include German banks. We understand the data-protection and reliability expectations of regulated financial institutions. The sector view is on our banking & insurance page.
For most new platforms in 2026 we start from a modern SFU: LiveKit when you want a batteries-included, scalable stack with SDKs and SIP interop, mediasoup when you need a lean, high-performance SFU core. Kurento remains the right niche answer when heavy server-side media processing is the actual requirement. We have built with LiveKit, and our deepest production operating experience is in media pipelines — so the recommendation comes from running these things, not from a comparison chart.
Yes, in both directions. We can operate and stabilize an existing Kurento estate (a skill that is getting hard to hire for), and we plan and execute migrations to modern stacks — mapping recording, RTP/SIP bridging and in-pipeline processing onto LiveKit- or mediasoup-based architectures without losing the features that made you choose Kurento originally.
Yes. We have built live multilingual captioning and translation for video consultations in 15 languages, including Indian languages, using Whisper ASR — running self-hosted, so audio never leaves the client's infrastructure.
No. It covers the whole real-time surface we engineer: video and audio over WebRTC, telephony interop via SIP, live captioning and translation in the media path, recording and queue management. Video consultation is the application we have taken furthest in production.
Yes. We have built AI damage analysis on live insurance video calls using a self-hosted open vision-language model, feeding frames from the media pipeline to the model in real time.
Yes. Long-term operation is our preferred engagement model — we run CI/CD, containerized deployment, and monitoring for the platforms we build. See our security & data stewardship page for how operational access is scoped.