CI/CD pipelines
Automated build, test and deploy pipelines so releases are boring, frequent and reversible.
Services
We build and run the platform your software lives on — CI/CD, containers, monitoring and long-term managed operations, with GPU and AI infrastructure as our named specialty.
Evidence
Capabilities
Automated build, test and deploy pipelines so releases are boring, frequent and reversible.
Packaging applications and AI model servers into containers for reproducible deployment across environments.
Metrics, logging and alerting for both application health and infrastructure utilization, so problems are seen before users see them.
Long-term operation of the platforms we build: deployment ownership, monitoring, incident response, routine maintenance and capacity planning, by the same team that wrote the code.
Hardening, patching, backup and restore procedures, and the unglamorous discipline that keeps a platform boring.
Measured benchmarking to size infrastructure against real load; our transcription tuning work (a measured six-fold capacity gain per GPU) came from exactly this discipline.
Spotlight
Most platform teams have never had to size a GPU. We have — repeatedly, with a benchmark in front of us.
We run production AI stacks (speech recognition, translation, TTS, vision) on dedicated GPU hardware and handle the whole lifecycle: sizing, deployment, model serving, monitoring, tuning and the capacity conversation that follows. The economics of self-hosting live or die on how much work one card actually does, and that is a measurement, not a datasheet claim. On our own stack the measured answer moved from the original baseline to up to six times the baseline live-transcription capacity per GPU.
That specialty sits on top of ordinary, careful platform work — pipelines, containers, monitoring, backups — because a GPU with no deployment discipline around it is just an expensive server.
Method
If a deployment step is manual, it is a future outage — everything repeatable goes into the pipeline.
Benchmarks on real workloads decide hardware, not guesses. That is how we found a 4–6x throughput gain on hardware that was already paid for.
For data-sensitive workloads (especially AI), we favor dedicated, self-managed infrastructure over third-party APIs — sovereignty and cost control together.
We stay accountable after go-live: monitoring, incident response and continuous improvement as an ongoing engagement, with every commitment written down.
FAQ
Yes. We run production AI stacks (speech recognition, translation, TTS, vision) on dedicated GPU hardware, and we handle the full lifecycle: sizing, deployment, model serving, monitoring and tuning.
Yes. CI/CD, containerization, monitoring and managed operations are standing services — they underpin every platform we build, AI or not. GPU work is the named specialty because that is where our published capacity numbers come from, not because it is the whole domain.
Support and response commitments are agreed per engagement and written into the contract, sized to what the platform actually needs — the same team that built and runs the system is the team answering. Tell us your availability requirement early and we will tell you straight away what we can commit to and how it would be staffed.
Often, at sustained volume — but the real answer comes from benchmarking. We measure your workload's throughput per GPU first; our own tuning work has shown that the same hardware can deliver several times more — up to a six-fold gain in live-transcription capacity — which changes the economics substantially.
Yes, after a structured onboarding: we audit the current setup, put monitoring and deployment automation in place, and then run it as a managed engagement. The onboarding phase is real work rather than a formality — it is what makes the operations that follow boring.
Deployment pipeline ownership, monitoring and alerting, incident response, routine maintenance and capacity planning — an ongoing engagement with the same team, not a ticket queue.