Data-residency and sovereignty architecture
Designing where data lives, where it is processed and what never leaves, so the answer to "where is our data?" is a diagram rather than a promise.
Services
Architecture that survives a bank's data-protection officer and an auditor: data residency, access models, GDPR-by-design and DORA-aware engagement terms. Compliance-driven engineering, built into the system rather than documented around it.
Evidence
Capabilities
Designing where data lives, where it is processed and what never leaves, so the answer to "where is our data?" is a diagram rather than a promise.
Named individual accounts, least privilege, scoped and revocable vendor access, bastion/VPN and approval workflows on the client's side, and the documentation an auditor asks for.
Data minimization built into the architecture, retention and deletion designed in per deployment, DPA and SCC readiness for remote support access.
The sovereign AI pattern: self-hosted models instead of third-party AI APIs, so there is no transfer to justify.
Code review before merge, secrets kept out of repositories and injected at deploy time, environment separation, containerized reproducible builds, dependency and patch hygiene.
Contract terms that fit your register of information, cooperation with audits, defined exit and handover support.
We complete client security questionnaires and take due-diligence calls directly, with the engineers who built the system in the room rather than a sales intermediary.
Method
If the design puts data somewhere a regulator dislikes, no policy document fixes it.
Where data lives, who can reach it and how long it is kept are written down per deployment, so an auditor reads a record rather than a recollection.
Every decision — logging, access control, residency, retention — is made assuming someone will later ask why.
The least risky vendor access is the access that was never granted; we start from what the work actually requires.
FAQ
Architecture. We design where data lives, who can reach it, how long it is kept and how that is evidenced — data residency, access models, GDPR-by-design and DORA-aware engagement terms, built into the system and documented per deployment. Our working practice is ISO 27001-aligned and described on our security page.
Because it does not come to us. Production deployments run in your infrastructure, in your jurisdiction, under your administrative control; what crosses a border is scoped, named, revocable remote access by individual engineers, covered by a DPA and SCCs where required. The full answer, including what we support contractually, is on the security & data stewardship page.
It means the compliance property is a consequence of the design rather than a policy on top of it. The clearest example: our AI stacks run self-hosted on client-controlled hardware, so audio, text and video never transit a third-party AI provider. There is no transfer to assess, because there is no transfer.
Yes. We engage as a DORA-aware ICT third-party provider: contract terms that fit your register of information, cooperation with audits, and defined exit and handover support. That is an engagement-terms capability, not a compliance certification.
Yes — directly, specifically, and answered by the engineers who built the system rather than routed through a sales desk.